Cheatcode_
Feedback

Front page / By role / Hiring manager intake

Hiring manager intake

Understand the role before searching.

For Recruiter · Knowledge pack and an independent checker

What are you writing?

One line is enough. Step 1 asks the rest in your AI app, and nothing is done until you approve the brief it writes.

It never leaves this computer: not uploaded to Cheatcode, never used to train a model. Your AI app reads it from the case folder.

Add details (optional)
Start

Step 1 asks anything else it needs, in your AI app. Nothing you write here or put in the case folder comes to Cheatcode.

In the case folder's materials/: The notes, documents or past examples it should rest on.

The 5 steps

  1. 01

    Gather and frame

    Then you approve, before the next step starts.

  2. 02

    Outline

    Then you approve, before the next step starts.

  3. 03

    Draft

  4. 04

    Independent check

  5. 05

    Finish

How it does this well

One writer from the person's material, checked by a fresh reader. Not found and out of scope are valid answers here: it says so instead of guessing.

How the field does this well
  • Use structured instruments: the same questions, planned follow ups and a four level rubric with example answers.
  • Remove names, photos and other proxies for protected traits in a script before any model reads a candidate's material. Keep the record IDs the person works with (employee, ticket or case numbers) so every finding names the row they will fix.
  • Score only against the written rubric with evidence quoted.
  • Draft instruments and plans; never rank people.
Ground it first

Ask for, or look in materials/ for: the role's attributes and level, the competency framework, and the company's policies. If there is none, say plainly that the result rests on general defaults, and name them.

What stays with the person

Every screening, hiring and people decision, and defining the role's attributes. Prepare these; never decide them.

The check that makes it trustworthy

Proxies redacted before the model reads anything about a person, and every judgment quoted against the rubric.

The person's own data

If the person has connected Google Drive / Docs / Sheets, Microsoft 365 (Excel, SharePoint, Teams), Notion, Slack, read their data through that connector instead of asking for exports, and say which source each number or fact came from. Without one, work from materials/.

The agents

checker
Checks a Cheatcode draft against its brief and its claims with fresh eyes, pass or fail per criterion.

Where things stay

On your computer
Your files in materials/, every result in outputs/, the work itself. It runs in your AI app, on the plan you already pay for.
With Cheatcode
The steps, the gates and how far each case has come, so a case survives closing the app. See your cases.