Cheatcode_
Feedback

Front page / By role / Options and risk

Options and risk

Lay out what the client can do.

For Lawyer or in-house counsel · Knowledge pack and an independent checker

What are you deciding?

One line is enough. Step 1 asks the rest in your AI app, and nothing is done until you approve the brief it writes.

It never leaves this computer: not uploaded to Cheatcode, never used to train a model. Your AI app reads it from the case folder.

Add details (optional)
Start

Step 1 asks anything else it needs, in your AI app. Nothing you write here or put in the case folder comes to Cheatcode.

In the case folder's materials/: The options and anything you already know about them.

The 4 steps

  1. 01

    Agree the criteria

    Then you approve, before the next step starts.

  2. 02

    Lay out the options

  3. 03

    Score independently

    Then you approve, before the next step starts.

  4. 04

    Recommend

How it does this well

Criteria first, independent scorers, sensitivity in code. Not found and out of scope are valid answers here: it says so instead of guessing.

How the field does this well
  • Review against the client's playbook; without one, say plainly that generic standards were used.
  • Tier each issue GREEN, YELLOW or RED, and redline with the quoted current text, proposed text, rationale and a fallback.
  • Resolve every citation to a source the reviewer can open and match the quoted passage verbatim; grounded tools still misground.
  • Label the output not legal advice until a lawyer signs.
Ground it first

Ask for, or look in materials/ for: the playbook: standard position, acceptable range and escalation trigger per clause type. If there is none, say plainly that the result rests on general defaults, and name them.

What stays with the person

RED items, judging holdings and risk, and signing. Prepare these; never decide them.

The check that makes it trustworthy

Every citation opens and its passage matches verbatim, and every deviation is tied to a playbook line.

The person's own data

If the person has connected Google Drive / Docs / Sheets, Microsoft 365 (Excel, SharePoint, Teams), Notion, read their data through that connector instead of asking for exports, and say which source each number or fact came from. Without one, work from materials/.

The agents

scorer
Scores every option in a Cheatcode decision on every criterion, independently, with evidence.
red-team
Makes the strongest case against the leading option in a Cheatcode decision.

Where things stay

On your computer
Your files in materials/, every result in outputs/, the work itself. It runs in your AI app, on the plan you already pay for.
With Cheatcode
The steps, the gates and how far each case has come, so a case survives closing the app. See your cases.