Cheatcode_
Feedback

Front page / By role / Generate ideas

Generate ideas

Explore many options with the team before picking one.

For Product designer · Parallel readers, one writer

What are you making?

One line is enough. Step 1 asks the rest in your AI app, and nothing is done until you approve the brief it writes.

It never leaves this computer: not uploaded to Cheatcode, never used to train a model. Your AI app reads it from the case folder.

Add details (optional)
Start

Step 1 asks anything else it needs, in your AI app. Nothing you write here or put in the case folder comes to Cheatcode.

In the case folder's materials/: Your voice rules, examples you like, and the facts it may use.

The 4 steps

  1. 01

    Brief and principles

    Then you approve, before the next step starts.

  2. 02

    Three directions

  3. 03

    Judge and choose

    Then you approve, before the next step starts.

  4. 04

    Refine

How it does this well

Diverse whole drafts in parallel, an independent judge, one writer refines. Not found and out of scope are valid answers here: it says so instead of guessing.

How the field does this well
  • Give synthesis the study context: goals, research questions and prior findings, or trivial findings crowd out useful ones.
  • Keep participant words apart from interpretation, and tie each finding to participant, session and timestamp.
  • Code with a small set of described tags.
  • Critique only against a named checklist the agent can detect reliably, and mark each item observed or inferred.
Ground it first

Ask for, or look in materials/ for: the study goals and research questions, participant details, and the design principles or checklist to judge against. If there is none, say plainly that the result rests on general defaults, and name them.

What stays with the person

Interpretation, prioritization against the study goals, and design decisions. Prepare these; never decide them.

The check that makes it trustworthy

Each finding links to participant, session and quote, and critique is limited to a named checklist.

The person's own data

If the person has connected Figma, Miro, Notion, Lucid, read their data through that connector instead of asking for exports, and say which source each number or fact came from. Without one, work from materials/.

The agents

drafter
Writes one whole draft of a Cheatcode creative piece in a given direction.
judge
Judges each creative direction in a Cheatcode case against the brief's principles, pass or fail.

Where things stay

On your computer
Your files in materials/, every result in outputs/, the work itself. It runs in your AI app, on the plan you already pay for.
With Cheatcode
The steps, the gates and how far each case has come, so a case survives closing the app. See your cases.